MANK. In Select Theaters November and on Netflix on December 4.
Starring Academy Award Winner Gary Oldman, Amanda Seyfried, Lily Collins, Arliss Howard, Tom Pelphrey, Sam Troughton, Ferdinand Kingsley, Tuppence Middleton, Tom Burke, and Charles Dance.
Directed by David Fincher.
Follow MANK:
Instagram: @mank
Twitter: @mankfilm
SUBSCRIBE: http://bit.ly/29qBUt7
About Netflix:
Netflix is the world’s leading streaming entertainment service with 193 million paid memberships in over 190 countries enjoying TV series, documentaries and feature films across a wide variety of genres and languages. Members can watch as much as they want, anytime, anywhere, on any internet-connected screen. Members can play, pause and resume watching, all without commercials or commitments.
MANK | Official Trailer | Netflix
https://youtube.com/Netflix
1930s Hollywood is reevaluated through the eyes of scathing wit and alcoholic screenwriter Herman J. Mankiewicz as he races to finish “Citizen Kane.”
Watch Full movie Free:
Download MANK | Official Trailer | Netflix Here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSfX-nrg-lI
Filming on digital was a huge mistake, and I don't understand why Fincher wanted such hammy performances. It didn't work.
I cannot purchase this film. Why?
Could one person just simply write a comment informing the rest of us if the film is worth watching is it any good??? Is that too hard??
Instead of all these weird fake comments
It was the first time propaganda commercials were used against a candidate running for office. In the present as in the past history repeats itself. Hearst hands off the baton to Rupert Murdock. Why did it take so long between the two men in history in dividing the country again. They had to get rid of that fair media practice law.
A trailer that tries way too hard. Give us 50% less blabbing and we'll digest more of the dialogue you want us to hear. Feels like a jumbled mess. And if that's the point, then I'd turn it off. There's wonderful music playing underneath all this dialogue, sadly it's hard to appreciate it.
The movie uses brilliantly crafted righteousness storytelling to fabricate a lie.
If they'd really been the enemy, they'd never get nominated for an academy award. Awards and critic's movie reviews are all fake, they review however they're told to. Obviously they are smart enough to give some movies bad reviews to make everything seem real and balanced. It's not. That's why any movie they really want us to see, to push whatever culture they intend to manufacture upon our minds, they will generally give amazing reviews for — even if the movie is hack trash — which most are.
all stories are fake, including news stories. Just like tons of our government sponsored education is mostly lies, like history for example.
Mank, as a movie, is wonderful storytelling. The opening was weak for me, but after the brief drag in the beginning, it took off and never stopped being excellent the entire rest of the way, and I was very impressed. It's a beautiful and mostly realistic morality tale. Worthy of academy award nominations itself.
How dark a heart uses morality tales to manipulate the masses. They use morality like a weapon, betraying the concept of morality through and through, to its absolute core and essence.
is there a more vicious thing to do psychically upon millions of minds, to appeal to their goodness to manipulate them into serving a totally, utterly deceptive system?
Our world is poor template for heaven, yet the template is there — but there's too many hacks and traitors in positions they should never touch again, and without that correction, by willing wisdom of those who should abdicate…
or by the raw force of infinite God…
But it's going to come whenever God decides. And all know it is His will. Just use your intuition.
You, who are evil, and ganged up in secret to do evil deeds, you are, yourself, time bombs, ticking, and none of us know when they go off, and after that, it's too late — too late for you.
Correct it. Here your long lost brother and correct it.
Because you will soon be the targeted individuals, and not by anything you can see coming, not by anything you can predict (apparently), not by anything you really seem to understand from my observation of your ways.
And yet It's coming, It's Infinite, It's Everywhere, It's Everything and yet encompassing all things as a whole and distinct soul of the whole, comprehending all things at once, whereas you, my brothers and sisters, are but spotlight scared consciousnesses selling out when you never needed to, and the less that had, the easier it would of been for all.
You have insisted of the full education of morality.
And God shall provide what is insisted upon.
I recommend, as my greatest mercy, you all to voluntarily do all the good you can, right now, constantly, and expose all evil you know, everywhere and to everyone at all opportune times — until you die.
Because you don't want to experience God's Horror 'Hamlet'.
1 part infinite creative power
1 part a just debt of incalculable proportions, from your evils, and acting as ammunition for the echo on the innocents behalf thundering in approach
1 part moral instruction, not only is it justice that all scales be balanced, it is long term love, and serves the greater good
Who is to say the worst of you cannot earn heaven? I cannot say that, and no one can.
Perhaps you can EARN it, by acts of great righteousness.
If you can win God's heart over, then who knows what's possible.
It's not a war, it's never been one, it's a test, a series of choices with no certainty of anything, but vague ideas like God, karma, the golden rule, yadda yadda, heaven hell, but who's really sure?
Well that's the point. That's why it's a perfect test, to see what you are, by how you choose when you thought maybe no one's watching, maybe there's no consequences.
God let's the satan's test all. But of course.
You go to school to take tests.
What other purpose would exist in a heart like Almighty God's for the creation of the soul, and free will?
Only to see what we'd choose. Those choices are what we are. No one is a demon or angel by appearance. You are by choice.
If faking things doesn't work on God, why bother faking things upon other people.
God is just. The scales will balance, by the infinite force of God's pendulum of purpose for the soul, or by your graceful abdications.
You are not the ruling class. It's spiritually untrue, as of now, and you've tested the theory, and it's proven and extant.
Willingly pay the prices of the debts you know in your heart.
Is there another sane path I've overlooked?
I see no other sane paths for any of you.
I can’t believe I hadn’t heard of this movie and this story til now. It seems all so fascinating
Fincher dropped the ball here, and Oldman was pretty hammy. I'll give it another chance at some point though.
The movie of queantine era
Any movie with a score by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross ends up being pretty good
Whyy did u film on digital david…
David fincher created this movie, but it didn't get enough audience and netflix spent a lot of money on it.
So yeah i get why netflix couldn't trust fincher anymore and cancelled mindhunter…
Gary Oldman is a great actor!
Mank!
Oldman's 90s impishness is back…and it's too contemporary for the 30s
Pretentious! imposter! Trying to look and sound old school lmao. This doesn't look like B/W movie shot on actual film but a digital camera, it looks too clean. Those fake audio flaws and jittery video doesn't give it the film look or feel, sorry. It still feels someone trying to emulate film but failing miserably. Want a picture to look and sound like film? Shoot film.
This black and white looks so fake I can’t stand it. How hard could it have been to just shoot the whole damn thing with 35mm really ?
whats the song at the end?
This looks cool, but it would still look so much better on film.
2:08
oh i gotta see this
Is this movie better watched if you see Citizen Kane first? I’ve seen neither.
i just checked the release date: dec 4. this trailer came out way too early. i was gonna watch it now. today is mar 17.
This looks hauntingly beautiful, even the trailer feels like a throwback to older films.
Only recently got round to this fascinating movie. Just been reading a little on the era & I think it was a sadly missed opportunity that Mank never worked with Mae West. They both hailed from the same neck of the woods, were theatre people, started at Paramount, brought the same kind of satirical/cynical wit to their work and they both ran afoul of American censorship & W.R Hearst at one time or another roughly around the same period, 20’s to 40’s. A collaborative effort between them would’ve been 🔥 as the kids say today, at least IMO.